KSW Successful Cases: Achieving Positive Outcomes

All

Business

Personal

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Review Reference #R0239077

Our client was a Search and Rescue Volunteer that developed PTSD due to his exposure to many traumatic events, which prevented him from working at his regular job. WorkSafeBC tried to set his wage rate at the statutory minimum of $10 per week because his injuries related to his volunteer work. We sought a review of this decision and the Review Division overturned the Board. As a result, our client now receives fair compensation.

Roy v. Tailwind Management Systems and others, 2013 BCHRT 258

The employer brought an application to dismiss our client’s human rights claim after she was terminated from employment during a medical leave. The Tribunal dismissed the application and found the case should proceed. The case was subsequently resolved before the hearing.

Royal Bank of Canada v. Seikhon Farms et al., 2014 BCSC No. B081815, Vancouver Registry

Chris was co-counsel in defending a large Abbotsford farming operation in an action brought by the Royal Bank for $800,000. We third-partied several other businesses involved in the transaction in question. One of the third parties was in bankruptcy and applied for an absolute discharge, which would have prevented our client from continuing the third party claim. We argued against the application and it was dismissed. The case was settled soon after this.

WCAT No. A1604204

Chris represented the developer of a large construction project in Abbotsford that was fined almost $60,000 in two separate penalty orders for alleged safety contraventions on site. After an initial review, the Review Division doubled the second penalty, increasing the total fine to $90,000. We appealed to WCAT and it was determined the Review Division’s reasoning was flawed. As a result, the second penalty was cancelled altogether and the fine reduced to less than $30,000.

Montgomery-Caplette v. Goldy Kang Real Estate Group

Neiser v. Su, 2014 BCHRT 190

Chris acted for the landlord of a premises in which the tenant alleged discrimination on the basis of a medical disability. The landlord had evicted her following the discovery of a modified electrical panel to support a marijuana grow operation and the tenant’s refusal to allow for repairs to the unit. We applied to dismiss the complaint and the Tribunal granted the application, finding the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and the allegations as merely speculative and conjectural.

Neiser v. Su, 2014 BCHRT 190

Firm

Services

People

Media

Business Services

Business Litigation & Disputes

Business Tax

Charities & Non Profit

Corporate Services

Employment Law & Human Rights

Insurance Defence

Labour Relations & Union Advice

Real Estate Services

Personal Services

Employment Law & Human Rights

Estate Planning Wills & Trusts

Family Law

Insurance Denials

Judicial Reviews & Appeals

Personal Injury

Personal Litigation & Disputes

Personal Tax

Real Estate Services

Successful Cases

People

Community

Students

Career

Team

Contact

Firm

Services

Locations

About KSW

History

Pay Bill

Media

Events & News

Media Library

Learning

LinkedIn