KSW Successful Cases: Achieving Positive Outcomes

All

Business

Personal

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

WCAT No. A1703496

Our client suffered a rare form of eye injury at her manufacturing plant. WorkSafeBC denied that the injury arose out of and in the course of employment. After an oral hearing at WCAT, the decision was overturned and the client received compensation for the injury, including retroactive benefits of $27,000 and a permanent pension until age 65.

WCAT-2015-03295

Our client was crushed between a metal bin and guard rail when a loader ran into the bin. He suffered serious physical injuries which were recognized by the Board, however he was only granted a 5% pension for the serious psychological conditions he developed, including PTSD and major depressive disorder. In a successful appeal, WCAT increased the psychological pension award to 15%, resulting in retroactive compensation of over $150,000 to our client.

Waterston v. Kerr, 2013 BCPC 148

Chris obtained an award for damages for client in this case involving a breach of contract. The defendant also brought a counterclaim against his client. Chris engaged a geotechnical engineer expert and and was successful in securing the dismissal of the counterclaim.

WCAT No. A1604204

Chris represented the developer of a large construction project in Abbotsford that was fined almost $60,000 in two separate penalty orders for alleged safety contraventions on site. After an initial review, the Review Division doubled the second penalty, increasing the total fine to $90,000. We appealed to WCAT and it was determined the Review Division’s reasoning was flawed. As a result, the second penalty was cancelled altogether and the fine reduced to less than $30,000.

Pringle v. Pringle, 2020 BCSC 75

Chris was co-counsel for the defendant in a case where the plaintiff claimed that the defendant intentionally ran him over with her vehicle. After a six day trial, the Court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims for aggravated and punitive damages and found the plaintiff was in fact 50% responsible for the incident.

R v. Sodyl, 2013 BCPC 213

Chris’ client was charged with possession of a controlled substance. We brought an application for exclusion of the evidence pursuant to Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court found that the stop of the vehicle was illegal, our client was not provided a timely right to counsel, and the grounds for the arrest were inadequate. As such, the search was deemed to be unreasonable. The evidence was excluded and the client was acquitted of the charges.

Randhawa v. Evans, 2020 BCCA 292

Firm

Services

People

Media

Business Services

Business Litigation & Disputes

Business Tax

Charities & Non Profit

Corporate Services

Employment Law & Human Rights

Insurance Defence

Labour Relations & Union Advice

Real Estate Services

Personal Services

Employment Law & Human Rights

Estate Planning Wills & Trusts

Family Law

Insurance Denials

Judicial Reviews & Appeals

Personal Injury

Personal Litigation & Disputes

Personal Tax

Real Estate Services

Successful Cases

People

Community

Students

Career

Team

Contact

Firm

Services

Locations

About KSW

History

Pay Bill

Media

Events & News

Media Library

Learning

LinkedIn