KSW Successful Cases: Achieving Positive Outcomes

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Royal Canadian Legion Branch Maple Ridge Branch #88 v Service, Health, Manufacturing and Allied Workers Union, CLAC Local 501, 2016 CanLII 44229 (BC LRB)

Chris represented the Employer in defending a reconsideration application before the Labour Relations Board involving the description of a bargaining unit in the context of a union raid application. The union’s resonsideration application was denied.

S.S. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission, 2019; Tribunal Number: GE-19-1950

Chris’ client was denied Employment Insurance benefits after the Commission determined that she had left her job voluntarily. We appealed to the Social Security Tribunal and successfully argued that our client was in fact terminated from employment and therefore she was entitled to EI benefits. She received a retroactive payment and ongoing support during her search for new employment.

Sargeant v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 893

Chris represented our client in a judicial review application in federal court after his security clearance license was rescinded by Transport Canada following the discovery of a dated arrest in Washington state. His employer terminated him due to the loss of his security clearance. The Court issued an important decision regarding the review of security clearance decisions and procedural fairness regarding the process.

WCAT No. A1604204

Chris represented the developer of a large construction project in Abbotsford that was fined almost $60,000 in two separate penalty orders for alleged safety contraventions on site. After an initial review, the Review Division doubled the second penalty, increasing the total fine to $90,000. We appealed to WCAT and it was determined the Review Division’s reasoning was flawed. As a result, the second penalty was cancelled altogether and the fine reduced to less than $30,000.

Montgomery-Caplette v. Goldy Kang Real Estate Group

Neiser v. Su, 2014 BCHRT 190

Chris acted for the landlord of a premises in which the tenant alleged discrimination on the basis of a medical disability. The landlord had evicted her following the discovery of a modified electrical panel to support a marijuana grow operation and the tenant’s refusal to allow for repairs to the unit. We applied to dismiss the complaint and the Tribunal granted the application, finding the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and the allegations as merely speculative and conjectural.

Neiser v. Su, 2014 BCHRT 190

Firm

Services

People

Media

Business Services

Business Litigation & Disputes

Business Tax

Charities & Non Profit

Corporate Services

Employment Law & Human Rights

Insurance Defence

Labour Relations & Union Advice

Real Estate Services

Personal Services

Employment Law & Human Rights

Estate Planning Wills & Trusts

Family Law

Insurance Denials

Judicial Reviews & Appeals

Personal Injury

Personal Litigation & Disputes

Personal Tax

Real Estate Services

Successful Cases

People

Community

Students

Career

Team

Contact

Firm

Services

Locations

About KSW

History

Pay Bill

Media

Events & News

Media Library

Learning

LinkedIn